Medlevate
Thesis

A market estimate is only as good as its weakest assumption.

Most sizing tools hand you a number and call it done. Medlevate shows how the number was built: every population count, price band, and adoption rate, each labeled by where it came from.

You know your disease area better than any tool does. If an assumption is wrong, change it. The model reruns and the recommendation updates.

19+ Cited sources per report
12,788 Federal demand signals indexed
32 Biomedical sub-expert profiles
01

Worked example

The segmentation has to change with the product.

A drug going through payers looks nothing like a diagnostic sold to labs, or a research instrument bought on a grant. Pick a product type below and see how the model shifts.

Cell Basis Price Cell value
Total addressable
Serviceable
Year-3 obtainable
P10 – P90

02

Dimensions considered and rejected

What got cut, and why.

We only segment on things that actually change what a buyer pays or whether they buy at all. Race and ethnicity matters for equity research but doesn't move a diagnostic pricing model. Practice size collapses into site of care. Each report shows what got excluded and the reason.

    03

    How a report is built

    Classify

    Establish what it is

    Product type, who actually signs the purchase order, whether it goes through FDA at all. Get this wrong and everything else is wrong too, so it runs first.

    Retrieve

    Find the denominator

    Prevalence registries, facility counts, grant awards, patents, published literature. What's worth pulling depends on the buyer. Every number keeps a reference to where it came from.

    Derive

    Build the cells

    Pick the dimensions that actually change price or adoption and build a cell for each one. The math runs in code, not in a paragraph where it can't be checked.

    Contest

    Check it, then correct it

    If the numbers don't add up, the verifier says so. You can change any assumption you know better than we do, and the rest of the model adjusts.

    04

    Pricing

    Pick the level of depth your project needs.

    Every tier gives you the same thing: labeled sources, explicit assumptions, and a sensitivity ranking. The difference is how many reports you need and how far you want to dig.

    Researcher
    $20 /month
    • 3 reports per month
    • Standard data latency
    • Email support
    Get started
    Enterprise
    $299 /month
    • Unlimited reports
    • API access & integrations
    • White-labeling options
    • Dedicated account manager
    Contact sales
    05

    Primary sources

    Every number resolves to something you can open.

    Citations attach to the specific numbers they support when they're pulled, so a source can't get separated from its claim. Anything we couldn't source is labeled as assumed and flagged in the sensitivity ranking.

    Population

    • CDC WONDER
    • SEER
    • NHANES · BRFSS
    • US Census ACS

    Care delivery

    • AHA Annual Survey
    • CMS Provider of Service
    • NPPES
    • CLIA registry

    Payer

    • CMS coverage data
    • Medicare Part B utilization
    • Fee schedules

    Research funding

    • NIH RePORTER
    • NSF Awards
    • USASpending
    • NCSES HERD

    Regulatory · IP

    • openFDA
    • ClinicalTrials.gov
    • Google Patents
    • SEC EDGAR

    Literature

    • PubMed E-utilities
    • bioRxiv · medRxiv
    06

    For people who have to defend the number in the room.

    Built for tech transfer offices, research PIs, and founders working on commercialization plans. We're in limited release right now. If you want to run a report and stress-test it, reach out.